I hope Photolab never follows that course. That is something that a raw processor like ON1 is attempting to do. Just adding deep Prime and adjusting the layout and adding watermarks certainly is not worth £70.įor this amount of money I would have expected focus stacking, HDR, merge stitching Panoramas on top of what has been already offered.Īs already indicated by what you seem to want is all the functionality of a pixel editor in a raw converter / processor. I don’t think DXO Photolab 4 is enough of an upgrade to justify £70 to upgrade. Only option that is much cheaper is Affinity Photo since they have a very low entry price and provide free upgrades since forever. If you buy/upgrade at the right time, you pay between $70 to $120 a year on average for either DxO, Capture One, Lightroom, Alien Skin Xposure, Luminar, ACD See or ON1.
Dxo photolab 2 worth upgrade update#
So there you have your answer… software development costs money and takes time… you have to pay for it in any case: upfront, monthly or with mandatory upgrades if you decided to update your camera and/or lenses along the way. Too many photographers have this attitude of “I want every software to offer everything single feature that Lightroom offers, because I don’t want to pay Adobe for a subscription”. How does that different from any other option you have beside open-source applications? Capture One, Adobe, Luminar etc. It’s a money making racket with hardly any worthy upgrades. Plus you have to upgrade everytime a new upgrade becomes available, you can’t skip Photolab 4 and upgrade on Photolab 6.
0 kommentar(er)
